Rosenfeld, Meters. J. (2010, April). Fulfilling on the internet: The rise of Web sites just like the a personal intermediary. Presentation at the People Relationship from The united states Group meetings, Dallas, Tx. [ Links ]
Shtatfeld, Roentgen., & Barak, A. (2009). Activities linked to opening social connections towards Internet dating sites: A perspective from the personal change principle. Interpersona: A global Journal on the Personal Relationship, 3, 19-37. [ Backlinks ]
Skopek, J., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H-P. (2010). Exactly who relationships exactly who? Informative homophily during the on the internet lover solutions. Western european Sociological Review. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sprecher, S. (1998a). Insiders’ views for the things about attraction to a virtually most other. Public Psychology Every quarter, 61, 287-three hundred. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sprecher, S. (1998b). Exactly what possess married partners keen on both? Free Inquiry for the Innovative Sociology, 26, 193-two hundred. [ Backlinks ]
Sprecher, S., & Duck, S. (1994). Sweet talk: The necessity of identified communications for romantic and you can relationship attraction feel throughout a rating-familiar with big date. Identification and you can Public Therapy Bulletin, 20, 391400. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). This new determine away from mothers and you can members of the family towards the top quality and you will stability off romantic relationships: A good three-wave longitudinal studies. Log of ily, 54, 888-900. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2000). Personal partners’ attitudes of social media characteristics towards passage through of some time matchmaking changes. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Orbuch, T. L., & Willetts, Yards. C. (2002). Social media sites and change during the private matchmaking. Within the A great. Vangelisti, H. Reis, & Yards. A great. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Balances and alter inside the Relationship (pp. 257-284). Cambridge: Cambridge College Drive. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Preference a couple of things (in certain anybody) over others: Companion choice within the romantic relationship and you may friendships. Journal out of Public and private Matchmaking, 19, 463-481. [ Links ]
Individual Relationships, eight, 325-340
Sprecher, S., Schwartz, P., Harvey, J., & Hatfield, Elizabeth. (2008). For the S. Sprecher, An excellent. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook off relationships initiation (pp. 249-265). New york: Psychology Drive/Taylor & Francis. [ Hyperlinks ]
Straaten, We., Engles, R. C. Meters. E., Finkenauer, C., & Holland, R. W. (2009). Fulfilling their matches: Exactly how elegance similarity influences strategy conclusion within the combined-sex dyads. Identity and you may Public Psychology Bulletin, 35, 685-697. [ Website links ]
Sunnafrank, Yards., & Miller, G. R. (1981). The newest character away from initially conversations when you look at the deciding attraction to viktig länk equivalent and dissimilar complete strangers. Human Telecommunications Search, 8, 16-twenty-five. [ Website links ]
Sunnafrank, Yards., & Ramirez, Good. (2004). Initially: Chronic relational aftereffects of rating-knowledgeable about talks. Diary away from Social and private Relationships, 21, 361-379. [ Backlinks ]
Tenny, Age. Roentgen., Turkheimer, E., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2009). Being appreciated is over which have a beneficial character: The role regarding matching. Log of Look into the Identity, 43, 479-585. [ Backlinks ]
Vangelisti, A beneficial. L., & Perlman, D. (Eds.) (2006). The Cambridge guide away from individual relationships. Cambridge University Drive. [ Hyperlinks ]
Thebusinessoflove: Relationship initiation at Internet dating functions
Walster, G.,W., Hatfield, Elizabeth., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Significance of physical elegance during the matchmaking choices. Record out-of Character and you may Social Psychology, cuatro, 508-516. [ Hyperlinks ]
Watson, D., Klohnen, Age. C., Casillas, Good., Simms, E N., Haig, J., & Berry, D. S. (2004). Matches brands and package breakers: Analyses regarding assortative mating for the newlywed people. Record out-of Identification, 72, 1029-1068. [ Links ]
Whisman, Yards. A good., Seashore, S. Roentgen. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2008). Is actually relationship dissension taxonic and will taxonic reputation getting reviewed easily? Comes from a national, user sample of maried people. Record off Consulting and Health-related Mindset, 76, 745-755. [ Backlinks ]